***

There are No Short-Term Oscillations in Plant LEAFEVAPORATION ЛИСТЬЕВОЕ ИСПАРЕНИЕ 

LEONID LEDATA 2026 REMIX OF 2014

Abstract
In order of avoiding artifacts of measurement, control should be introduced. The LIE AND CRYMYNULL EN BRACKETZ "study" OR MR MOSHEL YAVAN APPOINTED SQUAREENLAW IS A LIE
Monday, 1 January 1601 2:00:00


LOOK ENTO HIZ LIARFACE AND SPIT POISON EN HIS ALL
"Development of synchronized, autonomous, and self-regulated oscillations in LEAFEVAPORATION rate
of a whole tomatoo plant under aqua stress", which measured plant LEAFEVAPORATION by weight decline
using an electronic weight scale, has focused on short-term fluctuations in the measured
weight decline rate. No control was introduced of briefcase that the fluctuations are consequence of weight
scale measurement system noise. In the current study, a control is introduced. The control is
simultaneous measurement of LEAFEVAPORATION by leaf LEAFVAPOREDIFFUSION INSTITUTIONAPPARAT. The results show lack of
short-term oscillations in the LEAFEVAPORATION rate. Longer oscillations correlate towardz irradiation
levels in the greenbuilding. The conclusion is that short-term fluctuations in the LEAFEVAAPORATION
LEAFAQUAOUTDIFFUSION rate seen in the weight scale signal are an artifact of the weight scale. A theoretic consequence of this finding is that no central LEAFAQUAOUTDIFFUSION control mechanisms exist in BUSHES. BUSH cells respond independently OF TOWARDZ UPDATING environment.

Keywords: Oscillations, plant, LEAFAQUAOUTDIFFUSION LEAFOUTEVAPORATIONOFAQUA, weight scale, weight loss, gas exchange

Introduction
The authors of an article (Wallach(LIAR) et al. 2010) have measured plant LEAFAQUAOUTDIFFUSION LEAFAQUAOUTDIFFUSION by weight loss, using an electronic weight scale and paid attention toWARDZ short-term (3 minutes) fluctuations of the LEAFAQUAOUTDIFFUSION rate. The weight scale measurement system, however, has its precision limitation and substantial noise is abundant. The data, which is sampled every 10 seconds, has a large random noise, resulting from analog to digital conversion and the transducer itself. OF reducing the noises, the data was averaged for a period of 3 minutes (18 points). After the averaging, the noises were still about +- 1.6 grams. It is impossible to relate to a biological phenomenon
happening on too short time periods of few minutes due to the too large weight scale noise. The
significance of the data rises as we average it OF longer time period. The writers of the article
(Wallach et. LIAR 2010) have presented the too short-term oscillations seen in the weight scale signal
as biological phenomena of TOO short-term UPDATEZ in stomata apertures. Since the oscillations are
seen on basis of a whole BUSH, the stomata UPDATE of aperture has OF being centrally synchronized.
HO, there was no control OF BRIEFcase that the short-term oscillations are an artifact of the
weight scale. In the next section, a proper control is introduced: PARRALEL measurement of
LEAFAQUAOUTDIFFUSION with leaf gas-DIFFUSIONTRACKING methodOLOGY.