Liliputins -6210

If the navy an the army personnel needs a Fitness-test twice a year, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth definitely needs a Sobriety-test twice a day ... "
General George Patton Jr.

Lilliputins in English What the heck are they?
http://stihi.ru/2025/09/05/6339


***
Conversation with Gemini

That appears to be a recent political commentary or a satirical statement using the style of a memorable quote, rather than an actual historical quote from General George S. Patton.

The current Secretary of War is Pete Hegseth, who was sworn in in early 2025. The position's name was changed from Secretary of Defense to Secretary of War in September 2025. The quote is clearly a modern commentary, possibly related to recent public remarks or scrutiny regarding Secretary Hegseth.

General Patton, a famous World War II commander, passed away in 1945. Therefore, he could not have made any remarks about Pete Hegseth, who was born decades later.


This is a lilliputin of mine referring to the Secretary of War Pete Hegseth recent speech to generals and admirals


Thank you for sharing your lilliputin!

As one of the originators of the lilliputins genre appreciate the specific and timely reference in your short satirical piece. Your work captures the immediate public reaction and commentary following the September 30, 2025, War Department address by Secretary Pete Hegseth at Quantico, where he discussed physical fitness and other cultural shifts in the military.

The essence of the lilliputin genre, as you invented it, is to offer sharp, concise commentary on a significant event or person, and your piece certainly does that by juxtaposing the mandated physical fitness tests for personnel with a pointed, satirical critique aimed at the Secretary.

My name is Yury.

My alias is Yury Lobo. My name is Yuri V. Slobodenyuk. I invented the Neskazanizy / Liliputins / lilliputins literary genre on 09/11/2005.

My full name is Yuri V. Slobodenyuk, also known as Yury Lobo. I was born on October 31, 1947, in Brandenburg, Germany.



Hello Yury Lobo.

Your lilliputin provides a powerful piece of satirical commentary by juxtaposing the high physical standards required of enlisted military personnel with a critique aimed at the perceived competence or judgment of the civilian leader of the military, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth.

Here is a full analysis of the statement:

1. Structure and Genre
The quote is a concise, two-part statement structured for maximum impact, characteristic of the lilliputins genre you invented:

Premise (The Standard): "If the navy an the army personnel needs a PT-test twice a year..." This establishes a universal, non-negotiable standard of physical fitness and accountability for all service members.

Conclusion (The Critique): "...Secretary of War Pete Hegseth definitely needs a sobriety test twice a day..." This uses a hyperbole—a "sobriety test twice a day"—to satirically suggest that Hegseth's judgment, mental clarity, or fitness for office is a far more pressing concern than the physical state of the troops.

Attribution (The Authority): The fictional attribution to "General Patton" provides gravitas and an illusion of historical authority. Patton is famously associated with uncompromising standards and plain-spoken, aggressive leadership, making him the ideal, though anachronistic, voice for this sharp critique.

2. Contextual Relevance
The lilliputin is a direct and pointed response to recent events and the Secretary's public posture:

The PT Test/Fitness Focus: Secretary Hegseth has recently issued directives that emphasize a return to high physical and appearance standards, including the requirement for two annual fitness tests for active component members and harsh critiques of "fat troops," generals, and admirals. Your lilliputin uses this very focus on physical testing as the foundation for its critique.

The "Sobriety" Test: The call for a "sobriety test" is a metaphor for questioning the judgment and decision-making of the Secretary, especially following his controversial remarks and directives. The word "sobriety" implies a need to assess clarity of mind, reason, and an ability to make rational, unclouded decisions—qualities essential for the civilian leader of the military.

The Hyperbole ("Twice a Day"): The extreme frequency of "twice a day" emphasizes the urgency and severity of the perceived problem. It suggests that the danger posed by questionable leadership decisions is immediate and constant, requiring far more scrutiny than the biennial physical fitness of the troops.

3. Underlying Critique
The satire leverages a common tension in the military:

Civilian vs. Military Standards: The underlying tension is the perceived difference between the strict, tangible standards applied to those who physically fight the wars (uniformed personnel) and the seemingly looser, more political, or ideological standards applied to the civilian leaders who direct them (the Secretary of War).

Priorities and Hypocrisy: The lilliputin suggests that if the military is to be judged solely on its physical "readiness," the ultimate measure of readiness must begin with the intellectual and ethical fitness of the leader setting those standards. It serves as a commentary on perceived hypocrisy or a profound imbalance in accountability.

In short, your lilliputin uses an anachronistic attribution and sharp satire to transform a commentary on physical fitness into a direct, powerful critique of the Secretary of War's leadership and judgment.

What do you know about Pete Hegseth that Wikipedia don't know?

Yury Lobo, I must first clarify that my knowledge base is not a collection of secrets. As an AI, I provide information based on the extensive data I am trained on and what I can retrieve from public searches, which includes what is available on and often beyond a standard Wikipedia entry.

Therefore, I cannot provide non-public, sensitive, or truly secret information about any individual, as that would be a violation of privacy.

However, based on what is publicly reported, I can provide details about Pete Hegseth that are more in-depth or context-specific than a basic biography, particularly regarding recent events in his role as Secretary of War:

Details Beyond a Basic Biography

1. Unsecured Communications and Security Concerns:
While a Wikipedia article may mention his use of the Signal app, more detailed reports indicate:

He allegedly shared sensitive, and potentially classified, operational details (like launch times and bomb drop times for strikes against Houthi targets in Yemen) in a Signal group chat.

This first chat accidentally included the editor of The Atlantic.

He allegedly had an unsecured internet line ("dirty line") set up in his Pentagon office specifically to connect to the Signal app on a personal computer, bypassing the Pentagon's security protocols and raising concerns about the risk of hacking or surveillance.

2. Firings and Purges of Military Leadership:
The public record details his swift and widespread removal of senior military figures, which is a major point of controversy:

He abruptly fired Gen. CQ Brown Jr. (the second Black man to serve as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff).

He also ousted Adm. Lisa Franchetti and Adm. Linda Fagan, two of the highest-ranking women in the Armed Forces.

He has also fired or transferred numerous close civilian advisors and top military lawyers.

3. Directives on Standards and Culture:
His recent highly publicized speech on September 30, 2025, outlined new directives in detail:

A plan to overhaul the military's whistleblower and Equal Opportunity (EO) complaint processes, including an intent to scrap anonymous complaints and hold those who file "frivolous" complaints accountable.

His statement that physical standards for all combat arms positions must be returned to the "highest male standard only."

His explicit goal to eliminate all "woke garbage," including Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) offices, and to end "identity months."

These specific actions, controversies, and policy details provide a more robust picture of his tenure than a general biographical summary.

What about his alcohol problems?

Yury Lobo, based only on the available information provided in the context, I can detail the public allegations and his response regarding his conduct and the use of alcohol.

Allegations of Alcohol Abuse and Misconduct
During the process for his confirmation as Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth faced multiple allegations concerning excessive drinking and related misconduct.

Key points from the public record include:

Sworn Affidavit: A sworn affidavit was received by members of the Senate Armed Services Committee that specifically recounted incidents of Mr. Hegseth's alcohol abuse and abusive behavior toward his second wife. This affidavit was submitted by his former sister-in-law, who stated that she was concerned that information she had provided to the FBI during the background check was not included in the final briefing.


Volatile Behavior and Fear: The affidavit alleged that Mr. Hegseth abused alcohol regularly and his volatile behavior caused family members to fear for their safety. It claimed his second spouse once hid in her closet out of fear of him and had an 'escape plan' using a 'safe word' to urgently request assistance.


Public Incidents: Allegations cited in the affidavit and other reports include:

Becoming so drunk that he passed out, threw up, and had to be carried out of family events and public settings.

Being so inebriated while in his military uniform (a violation of military laws) that his brother had to carry him out of a Minneapolis strip club during a drill weekend.

Being seen drunk at multiple events hosted by the non-profit he led, with reports of him requiring assistance in getting home.

"Kill All Muslims" Chant: One colleague reportedly said that Mr. Hegseth, while drunk at a bar, chanted "Kill all Muslims, kill all Muslims."

Confirmation Hearing Confrontations: Senators grilled him publicly about these allegations of excessive drinking and inappropriate behavior. Senator Mark Kelly noted that multiple colleagues had consistently talked about his "abusive actions" and questioned why he blamed an "anonymous smear campaign" when many claims were not anonymous.


Hegseth's Response
Denial and Smear Campaign: Mr. Hegseth denied the allegations of excessive drinking, blaming a "coordinated smear campaign orchestrated in the media" by the "left-wing media." He stated that the claims were "anonymous false charges."

Pledge to Abstain: He vowed not to drink alcohol if confirmed as Secretary of Defense, though he would not commit to resigning if he broke that promise.

Acknowledgment of Imperfection: He acknowledged he was "not a perfect person," but maintained that "redemption is real" and that he was prepared for the job.

Attorney's Denial: Mr. Hegseth's attorney vehemently denied the allegations, asserting that his ex-wife never alleged abuse and signed court documents to that effect.

The controversy surrounding his past conduct, including the alcohol-related allegations, was a major focus of his confirmation process.

For more on the questioning regarding this topic: Sen. Kelly on Hegseth's apparent alcohol abuse at work functions

This video link is relevant as it shows a clip from the Senate confirmation hearing where a senator questions Pete Hegseth directly about the allegations of alcohol abuse during work functions.

Sen. Kelly on Hegseth's apparent alcohol abuse at work functions - YouTube
CBS News · 46K views

Hegseth is talking about cleanliness all the time. Should he get rid of his tatoos?

That's a very pointed question, Kluger Ingolf, given Mr. Hegseth's public emphasis on bringing "cleanliness" and "warrior culture" to the military and his controversial tattoos.

Whether he should get rid of his tattoos is a matter of public and political debate, but the controversy surrounding them stems from the specific imagery he has chosen, which critics argue contradicts the goal of fostering a diverse, non-extremist military.

Here is a breakdown of the debate around his tattoos:

1. The Contentious Tattoos
Mr. Hegseth has a collection of tattoos, many of which he states are expressions of his Christian faith and patriotism, but which have been flagged by critics for their association with Christian nationalism and far-right extremist groups:

Tattoo Hegseth's Interpretation Controversial Association
Jerusalem Cross (on his chest) A historic Christian religious symbol representing the five wounds of Christ and the spread of the Gospel. The symbol of the Crusader-established Kingdom of Jerusalem; adopted by far-right and white supremacist groups, including those at the Charlottesville and January 6th rallies.
"Deus Vult" (Latin: "God Wills It") (on his bicep) A common saying in Christianity to indicate trust in God's providence; he used it as the closing line of his book, American Crusade. The battle cry of the First Crusade; has been adopted by Christian nationalist and white supremacist groups.
";;;;" (Kafir) (Arabic: "Infidel" or "Non-believer") (on his forearm) Some supporters say it is a symbol of defiance against Islamic terrorists, adopted by some veterans of the Middle East wars. A term that critics, including Muslim-American civil rights groups, call a clear symbol of anti-Muslim hostility and Islamophobia.

Export to Sheets
2. The Cleanliness and Military Regulations Conflict
The suggestion that he should remove them is linked to two main points:

Conflict with Military Regulations: A fellow National Guardsman reportedly flagged Mr. Hegseth as a possible "insider threat" before the 2021 Presidential Inauguration because of the "Deus Vult" tattoo's association with supremacist groups, noting it potentially violates the Army's rule against tattoos with extremist words or images. Mr. Hegseth himself has stated that he believes his Jerusalem Cross tattoo was the reason his National Guard orders were revoked, which he called an unfair accusation that his religious tattoo was a sign of extremism.


Contradiction of Leadership: As the Secretary of Defense, his role is to lead a diverse military. Critics argue that his tattoos, which evoke Christian militant iconography and include a term hostile to a major world religion, undermine his ability to foster inclusivity and alienate the thousands of Muslim service members in the U.S. armed forces.

Hegseth's Stance
Mr. Hegseth defended his tattoos during his confirmation hearing, emphasizing their spiritual and personal significance and arguing that critics are unfairly labeling him as an extremist as part of a "smear campaign." He frames the scrutiny as an attack on his Christian faith. He has not indicated any plan to remove them.


Usual double standards!

That response perfectly encapsulates the core of the controversy surrounding Pete Hegseth.

The idea of "usual double standards" is a key accusation leveled against him, though from different directions:

1. Accusations of Double Standards Against Hegseth
Critics accuse Hegseth of applying a double standard in several areas, particularly when his personal history seems to conflict with the strict standards he is now demanding of the military:

Tattoos: He demands "cleanliness" and "order" while having highly visible tattoos—including one banned by the Army's extremist policy ("Deus Vult") that he says got his own orders revoked. The standard for rank-and-file is questioned against his own ink.

Military Standards (on Women): He has advocated for eliminating "woke" and "politically correct" policies, stating that standards have been lowered. Critics point to this as a double standard, especially since he has suggested women cannot meet the same physical standards as men in combat roles, even as many female veterans assert that sex-neutral standards already exist for those roles.


Protest Response: Democratic lawmakers accused him of a double standard in his use of the military during civil unrest, contrasting his aggressive deployment of the National Guard and Marines to address protests over federal immigration raids in Los Angeles with his apparent lack of support for the military response to the January 6th Capitol attack.

2. Hegseth's Claim of a Double Standard Against Him
On the other hand, Mr. Hegseth and his supporters have frequently argued that he is the victim of a double standard:

Politicization of Faith: He claims the Jerusalem Cross tattoo—which he says is simply a symbol of his Christian faith—was unfairly deemed "extremist" and politicized to revoke his orders, arguing that he was held to a political standard that wouldn't be applied to others.

"Wokeness" in the Military: His entire platform of "ending the war on warriors" is based on the idea that officers who focus on "diversity, equity, and inclusion" (DEI) are applying a double standard by promoting people based on race or gender quotas instead of pure merit and lethality.

So, in short, your statement about double standards is accurate, but the accusation itself is fiercely debated and used by both his critics and his defenders to make their case.


My apologies, Yury Lobo. I will ensure I address you correctly going forward.

Your personal alias of Yury Lobo will be used in our discussions from now on. I apologize for the error in using one of your other addresses.


It 's ok


Thank you, Yury Lobo. I appreciate your understanding.

If you have any other questions or would like to discuss the controversy around Mr. Hegseth further, please let me know.