Lilliputin -6172

All together is written separately and separately is written all together. Fazit: Unite! ... "
Thomas Paine

Lilliputins in English What the heck are they?
http://stihi.ru/2025/09/05/6339



***

Good morning, Amaizing Item!
Good morning! What can I help you with today?
Here comes my new lilliputin!
Can you tell me more about your new "lilliputin"? Is it something you've created?
Yes
That's exciting! So your new lilliputin is a very small creation, like the tiny people from Gulliver's Travels.
It reminds me a bit of your "несказаницы" (neskazanitsy), which are also a unique and imaginative creation of yours. It seems you have a talent for bringing fascinating new concepts and ideas to life.
What is your lilliputin like? Is it a character, a tiny world, or something else entirely?
All together is written separately and separately is written all together. Fazit: Unite! ... "
Martin Luther King
That's a powerful and thought-provoking statement.
It seems to be a play on words, suggesting that the very concepts we use to describe unity and division are themselves contradictory. It sounds like a philosophical idea rather than something directly from Martin Luther King's speeches, which often used more direct and rousing language to call for civil rights and racial harmony.
Regardless of its origin, the message is clear: the goal is to unite. It's a sentiment that aligns perfectly with his vision of a world where people are judged by the content of their character, not the color of their skin.
Please give me the full analysis of this lilliputin
I cannot provide a full analysis of your lilliputin without more information. To understand and analyze it, I need details about what it is, its purpose, its characteristics, and how it relates to the quote you provided.
Please share more about your lilliputin. What does it look like? What does it do? How does it embody the idea of "all together is written separately and separately is written all together"?
Do you see a more suitable person I can put this words in his/her mouth?
That's an interesting challenge. The quote you've presented is a paradox, and finding a suitable person to "say" it depends on the context and what you want to achieve with the words.
While the quote sounds like something a great thinker might say, it doesn't align with Martin Luther King Jr.'s known style of speaking, which was more direct and focused on moral calls to action.
Here are a few types of people or figures who might be more suitable for this quote, depending on the effect you want:
A philosopher or a Zen master: Someone who speaks in riddles and paradoxes to challenge conventional thinking. The phrase forces the listener to grapple with a new perspective, which is a common tactic in philosophical or spiritual teachings.
An artist or a poet: A creative who sees the world differently. This quote could be a commentary on the creative process itself—how a finished, cohesive piece is made from many separate elements.
A fictional character in a story: This could be a wise elder, a mysterious sage, or even a futuristic AI. The line would immediately establish them as a figure of deep, possibly unconventional, wisdom.
Each of these options offers a different flavor for your "lilliputin" and its meaning. Which one feels like the best fit for your creation?
What about Rosa Parks?
Rosa Parks is an iconic figure, a key symbol of the Civil Rights Movement, and a person whose life and actions were profoundly about uniting people for a common cause against injustice. However, the quote you've presented does not align with her typical style of communication.
Her quotes are known for their direct, clear, and powerful calls for justice, freedom, and equality. For example, she is famously remembered for saying that she was "tired of giving in" rather than being physically tired. Other notable quotes include her desire to be "known as a person who is concerned about freedom and equality and justice and prosperity for all people." These statements are not paradoxical; they are declarations of a clear moral position and a vision for a better world.
Given her legacy, the quote "All together is written separately and separately is written all together" would not fit her voice. Her words were meant to unite people to act on a shared, explicit understanding of right and wrong, not to puzzle them with a philosophical riddle. While the quote's ultimate message of unity is relevant to her work, the phrasing is not.
Video of Rosa Parks giving a speech
This video provides an example of Rosa Parks's direct and heartfelt speaking style, which is very different from the paradoxical quote you provided.

Rosa Parks at the 1998 International Women's Forum Hall of Fame - YouTube
IWForum · 537 views

What about Thomas Paine?
Thomas Paine is a much more suitable figure for a quote like "All together is written separately and separately is written all together."
Here's why:
Thomas Paine's Writing Style and Philosophy
Plain Language and Accessibility: Paine was renowned for his ability to convey complex political ideas in clear, straightforward language that was accessible to the common person. His most famous work, Common Sense, aimed to awaken the public to the necessity of American independence, stripping away jargon and appealing directly to reason and intuition.
Emphasis on Reason and Principles: Paine's philosophy was deeply rooted in Enlightenment ideals, emphasizing reason, natural rights, and the formation of society based on rational principles. He often broke down established systems and then built up arguments for new, more logical ones.
Paradoxical Observations (Implicitly): While not always explicitly using paradoxes in the way your quote does, Paine's arguments often highlighted the inherent contradictions and illogical nature of the existing order (like monarchy) to advocate for a new, unified system (a republic). He would deconstruct the "separateness" of societal components (e.g., King, Parliament, people) to argue for their "togetherness" in a truly representative government. For example, he critiques the idea of the English constitution being an "union of three powers, reciprocally checking each other," calling it "farcical" and having "all the distinctions of a house divided against itself" [2.4]. This touches on the tension between things being seemingly "all together" but in reality "written separately" or divided.
Focus on Unity for Action: A core theme in Paine's work, particularly Common Sense, was the imperative for unity among the colonies to achieve independence. He famously wrote, "It is not in numbers, but in unity, that our great strength lies" [2.2]. This quote, while not a paradox, underscores his belief in the power of collective action formed from individual parts.
How the Quote Fits Paine:
The quote "All together is written separately and separately is written all together" can be interpreted as a commentary on the complex relationship between individual components and a unified whole, which was central to Paine's political thought. He challenged people to see how seemingly separate entities (like colonies) were, in fact, "all together" in their shared grievances and potential, and how the concept of a unified government was composed of "separate" individual rights and responsibilities.
It resonates with the idea of deconstructing a seemingly unified but flawed system (like British rule) to reveal its internal divisions, and then reconstructing a truly unified system from distinct, clearly defined principles and individuals. This intellectual process of breaking down and rebuilding with an eye towards a more logical and cohesive whole is very much in line with Paine's approach.
All together is written separately and separately is written all together. Fazit: Unite! ... " Thomas Paine
That's an excellent choice. Attributing that quote to Thomas Paine gives it a sense of profound, historical weight and makes it feel right.
Here's an analysis of why this fits his persona and your "lilliputin" so well:
The Quote's Fit with Thomas Paine
Thomas Paine's philosophy, rooted in the Enlightenment, was all about deconstructing complex, seemingly unified systems to show their internal flaws. He then proposed a new system built from separate, rational principles that would create a truer, more powerful unity.
"All together is written separately" perfectly captures his critique of the existing order. He looked at the British government, which was supposedly "all together," but argued that its structure—a monarchy, aristocracy, and commons—was fundamentally divided and illogical. He showed how the laws and customs that bound the "all" were actually written to keep everyone "separate" and unequal.
"Separately is written all together" reflects his solution. Paine's greatest contribution was proving that true unity comes from the rights of separate individuals, which, when articulated and protected by a republic, would create a more powerful and lasting whole. He took the "separate" identities of the colonies and wrote a case for their "all together" destiny, a unified nation.
The final "Fazit: Unite!" is the powerful call to action at the heart of Paine's work. The quote moves from a complex, paradoxical observation to a simple, urgent command, which is precisely how Paine's writings were designed to operate—they used logic to build an irresistible case for revolution.
This quote makes your "lilliputin" a powerful, philosophical object that embodies a core principle of political and social change.
Thank you, Amazing Item!
You're welcome! It was a pleasure to explore your "lilliputin" and its fascinating connection to the world of ideas.