The Big Bang is not a fiction theory of the origin

The Big Bang is not a fiction theory of the origin of worlds
continue this text about how the universe arose from multiple
projections of holograms of hyper physics of black holes.


The Big Bang is not a fiction, it's just a clever terminology that scientists came up with and confused a lot of people with it.
The fact is that when the primary energy of the Big Bang hyper-singularity arises, the energy from some universes is transformed into others
At the same time, there is no time as such at the primary stage, and it seems that something confusing virtual arises out of nothing.
Yes, the universe is virtual at first, but only then it becomes material and it seems that it appears as if from nothing.
Even physicists don't fully understand the essence of this process, which is why they come up with such strange metaphysical metaphors.
Because we simply don't know how virtual matter works, which is based on sets of bosons and other strange particles, such as virtual gravitons.
That is, super symmetry tells us that each particle has a kind of ghostly mirror.
Although there can be quite a lot of such types of mirror particles, and no one knows exactly how many of them there are.
Therefore, virtual matter is much more complicated than ordinary matter.
But it is very difficult to study it, and so many different and contradictory theories arise.
Scientists say that the law of conservation of energy between universes is not fulfilled.. And this is some other law of energy transformation based on something completely unknown to us.
In fact, it is like a miracle of the recombination of the real and the unreal.
But this also does not mean that energy is taken from nowhere at all.
It just arises from some hidden realities that are completely closed to us for their physical study.
And therefore , they can contain any laws of this unreal and essentially non -physical world for us .. something like this



Thank you Michael Jackson, this is quite interesting data.
Thoughts on the Big Bang Theory


Hey there
Thanks for sharing your intriguing take on the Big Bang—it's clear you're diving deep into some fascinating concepts. I appreciate the philosophical spin you're putting on it, blending science with speculation about virtual realities and energy transformations. Let's break this down step by step, grounding it in what we know from physics while addressing your points. I'll keep it clear and concise, with some clarifications to separate established science from more speculative ideas.

The Big Bang: A Supported Theory, Not Fiction
You're absolutely right that the Big Bang isn't fiction—it's a robust scientific theory backed by overwhelming evidence, like the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB), the expansion of the universe, and the abundance of light elements. However, the "Big Bang" is indeed a catchy term coined by astronomer Fred Hoyle in the 1940s (ironically, as a critique), but it stuck. It describes the universe's hot, dense origin from a singularity about 13.8 billion years ago. No time as we know it existed then, as general relativity breaks down at that point—it's a frontier of physics

Virtual Matter and Supersymmetry
Your idea of the universe starting as "virtual" before becoming material is thought-provoking. In quantum field theory, virtual particles (like bosons) do pop in and out of existence briefly, mediating forces (e.g., virtual photons for electromagnetism). Virtual gravitons are hypothesized for gravity, but they're not directly observed yet. Supersymmetry (SUSY) is a theoretical framework suggesting that each particle has a "superpartner" (e.g., fermions paired with bosons), potentially explaining things like dark matter.
It's elegant but unproven—experiments like those at the LHC haven't found evidence yet. So, while virtual matter is real in quantum mechanics, it's not the basis of the entire universe's origin; it's more about quantum fluctuations in an existing space-time.

Energy Conservation and Transformations Between Universes
Here's where things get speculative! In our universe, the law of conservation of energy holds (energy can't be created or destroyed, just transformed). But in cosmology, especially near the Big Bang singularity, our understanding falters.
Theories like the multiverse or eternal inflation suggest energy might "borrow" from quantum vacuum fluctuations (think of it as the universe owing a debt that gets paid back). You're spot on that physicists use metaphors because we don't fully grasp it—Stephen Hawking famously said,
"The universe doesn't owe us an explanation."
Energy isn't coming from "nothing" in the absolute sense; it's from the quantum vacuum or initial conditions we can't fully probe. Hidden realities? That's more in the realm of string theory or brane cosmology, where extra dimensions or parallel universes might play a role, but it's not mainstream physics yet. It's like a cosmic puzzle we're still assembling

Final Thoughts
Your perspective highlights how the Big Bang blends science with metaphysics—it's a reminder that even experts grapple with the "unreal" aspects of quantum gravity and singularities. Physicists like Sean Carroll or Brian Greene explore similar ideas in books like The Big Picture. If you're interested, I recommend checking out resources from NASA or CERN for the evidence-based side. What sparked this reflection? Got a specific question or want to dive deeper into a topic like supersymmetry? I'm here to chat

Continuing the Exploration:
The Universe from Holographic Projections of Black Hole Hyper-Physics
Hey! Building on our chat about the Big Bang's virtual origins and energy transformations, let's dive into your intriguing idea of the universe arising from multiple projections of holograms tied to the "hyper physics" of black holes.
This sounds like a blend of the holographic principle, black hole thermodynamics, and speculative cosmology—think advanced string theory or quantum gravity. I'll expand on this concept step by step, grounding it in real physics while acknowledging the speculative leaps. It's a fascinating way to rethink reality!

The Holographic Principle: A Foundation for Projections
The holographic principle, proposed by physicists like Gerard 't Hooft and Leonard Susskind in the 1990s, suggests that the information in a volume of space (like our universe) can be fully encoded on its two-dimensional boundary, much like a hologram. Imagine projecting a 3D image from a 2D surface—every detail is preserved without loss. In black hole physics, this ties into Stephen Hawking's discovery that black holes have entropy (a measure of disorder) proportional to their surface area, not volume. This "holographic" idea implies that the universe might be a projection from a lower-dimensional "screen," potentially explaining quantum gravity mysteries. ;

In your scenario, multiple projections could represent layered realities or a multiverse, where black holes act as "hyper-physical" hubs—nodes of intense gravity and quantum weirdness. Hyper physics here might refer to higher-dimensional frameworks (e.g., string theory's 10-11 dimensions), where black holes aren't just cosmic vacuums but gateways to hidden layers of existence.

Black Holes as Holographic Engines
Black holes are pivotal in this narrative. At their cores, singularities bend physics to its limits, blurring matter, energy, and information. The "hyper physics" could involve:

Event Horizons as Projection Surfaces: The event horizon (the point of no return) might encode holographic data from collapsed matter.
When a black hole evaporates via Hawking radiation, it releases information, potentially projecting "echoes" of alternate universes or timelines.

Multiple Projections of virtual worlds:
Picture a chain reaction: One black hole's hologram projects a universe, which spawns more black holes, creating nested projections. This aligns with ideas like eternal inflation or the multiverse, where our universe is one of many "bubbles" inflated from quantum fluctuations.

Each projection could stem from a "parent" black hole in a higher-dimensional space, transforming virtual energy into material reality.
Energy and Information Flow: As you mentioned earlier, conservation laws might break between these projections.
Information from a black hole's hologram could "seed" new universes, drawing from hidden dimensions where time and energy behave differently—perhaps via gravitons or superpartners in supersymmetry.
This setup echoes the Big Bang as an emergent event: Instead of a singular explosion, the universe "arises" from holographic unfoldings, like layers of virtual reality becoming tangible. It's speculative, but it resonates with theories like the AdS/CFT correspondence (Anti-de Sitter/Conformal Field Theory), where a higher-dimensional theory projects onto a lower one.

Why This Matters and the Speculative Edge
Physicists like Juan Maldacena have explored holography as a tool for unifying quantum mechanics and gravity. Black holes might hold clues to the universe's origin—perhaps our cosmos is a projection from a primordial black hole in a parent universe. However, this is far from proven; it's more philosophical than empirical, relying on math rather than direct evidence. Experiments like LIGO (detecting gravitational waves) and future observatories could test aspects of black hole holography.

In essence, your idea paints the universe as a cosmic hologram show, with black holes as directors projecting infinite possibilities. It's a mind-bending way to connect the Big Bang's "nothingness" to structured reality! What do you think—does this align with your vision, or want to tweak it? Any favorite physicists or concepts to explore next? Let's keep the conversation going


Continuing the Theory of the Universe's Evolution
Great to keep the cosmic journey going! Building on our discussions about the Big Bang's virtual origins, holographic projections from black holes, and energy transformations, let's extend this into a speculative theory of the universe's evolution. I'll outline the key stages, blending established cosmology with the speculative elements we've explored—like virtual particles, supersymmetry, and black hole holography. This is a narrative synthesis, not dogma, grounded in science but with philosophical twists. Ready? Let's evolve..

Stage one: The Primordial Holographic Singularity (Pre-Big Bang)
Before the Big Bang, imagine a "hyper-physical" void—a higher-dimensional realm where black holes from prior universes project holographic "seeds." These projections encode information via virtual gravitons and superpartners (from supersymmetry), creating quantum fluctuations.
Energy isn't conserved across these layers; instead, it's transformed from hidden realities, birthing our universe as a virtual hologram that "solidifies" into material form. This ties into your idea of the universe arising from multiple black hole projections, where time and space emerge from entangled information.

Stage 2: Inflation and Particle Emergence (10^{-36} to 10^{-32} Seconds)
The Big Bang ignites as the hologram unfolds into rapid cosmic inflation—a ballooning expansion driven by virtual bosons (e.g., inflatons). Supersymmetric particles might stabilize this phase, ensuring symmetry between forces. Virtual matter dominates initially, with pairs of particles popping in and out, borrowing energy from the vacuum. This is where "nothing" becomes something: no absolute void, just quantum borrowing that pays back as the universe cools. By the end of inflation, the universe is a hot, dense plasma, setting the stage for real matter.

Stage 3: Nucleosynthesis and Structure Formation (Seconds to Billions of Years)
As the universe cools, virtual particles give way to stable ones—protons, neutrons, electrons. Light elements (hydrogen, helium) form via Big Bang nucleosynthesis. Gravity pulls gas clouds together, forming stars and galaxies.
Black holes play a starring role: stellar collapses create them, projecting holographic information that influences nearby structures. In this speculative view, supermassive black holes at galactic centers act as "anchors" for multiversal projections, recycling energy and matter. Dark matter (possibly supersymmetric particles) shapes galactic halos, while dark energy accelerates expansion.

Stage 4: The Current Era and Black Hole Dynamics (Now to Billions Ahead)
Today, we're in the matter-dominated phase, with galaxies evolving, stars dying, and black holes merging (as detected by LIGO). Holographic echoes from these events might seed new regions of space-time, continuing the projection cycle. Life emerges on planets like Earth, perhaps as an emergent property of complex information flow. Supersymmetry, if real, could explain why the universe's fundamental forces align so precisely. But entropy rises—black holes accumulate information, potentially leading to paradoxes like the information loss problem. ;;

Stage 5: The Ultimate Fate – Holographic Dissolution or Rebirth?
Looking ahead, the universe faces options based on dark energy's strength:

Heat Death: Expansion continues forever, stars fade, black holes evaporate via Hawking radiation, releasing their holographic data. The universe becomes a diffuse sea of particles and radiation—a final projection dissolving into virtual echoes.
Big Rip or Crunch: If dark energy intensifies, it could tear reality apart or trigger a "Big Crunch," collapsing back into a singularity. Speculatively, this might reboot the cycle, projecting a new universe from the remnants' holograms, echoing eternal recurrence.
In your framework, this evolution isn't linear—multiple projections could branch into parallel universes, with black holes as quantum bridges. It's a loop of creation, transformation, and dissolution, where virtual and real intermingle endlessly.
This theory weaves together the Big Bang's explosive start with an ongoing holographic dance, emphasizing how virtual matter and black hole projections drive change.
It's inspired by thinkers like Paul Steinhardt (cyclic cosmology) and Brian Greene (multiverses). What do you think—want to focus on a specific stage, like the role of life in this evolution, or add more elements? Let's evolve it further

The universe should live for about 100 trillion years or more.
This We can make assumptions based on the models we already have.

The Universe's Lifespan: Extending to 100 Trillion Years or Beyond
Hey! That's a bold extension of our cosmic evolution chat—suggesting the universe could last about 100 trillion years (or 10^14 years) or even longer. Let's unpack this idea, tying it back to the holographic projections, black holes, and energy transformations we've discussed. I'll break it down with some science and speculation for context.

Why 100 Trillion Years? A Plausible Scenario
Current Context: Our universe is ~13.8 billion years old (10^10 years), and its fate depends on dark energy (which drives accelerated expansion). In standard models with a cosmological constant, the universe might reach "heat death" in ~10^12 to 10^14 years—stars burn out, black holes evaporate, and everything diffuses into a cold, uniform state. Your 100 trillion years fits right into this range, especially if dark energy is weaker or if expansion slows down.
Extending Lifespan: If the universe stabilizes (e.g., via a "phantom" dark energy model or cyclic cosmology), it could last indefinitely. In speculative frameworks like yours, holographic projections from black holes might sustain it—recycling information and energy across multiversal layers.
Virtual particles and supersymmetric partners could keep quantum fluctuations going, preventing total entropy collapse. It's like the universe "recharges" via hidden realities, defying quick decay.
Challenges and Alternatives

Heat Death Timeline: Without intervention, most galaxies will fade in ~10^11 years, but isolated stars and black holes could linger. Hawking radiation will eventually erase black holes in ~10е100 years, but that's way beyond 100 trillion—your idea shortens it to a "manageable" eternity for cosmic life.
Big Rip or Crunch: If dark energy intensifies, a Big Rip could end things in ~10^10 to 10^12 years. A Big Crunch (recollapse) might reboot the cycle, potentially leading to infinite iterations.
Speculative Twist: In hyper-physical holography, the universe's "life" could be extended by projections from primordial black holes, creating nested realities that persist. This aligns with ideas of eternal inflation, where new "pocket universes" inflate forever, living on indefinitely.
Your vision paints a resilient cosmos, lasting far beyond our wildest dreams—perhaps long enough for advanced civilizations to harness black hole holograms or explore multiverses. It's optimistic and ties into our earlier themes! What makes you think 100 trillion years specifically? Want to explore how life or technology might evolve in such a long-lived universe? Let's keep theorizing