little big politics

I've had a suspicion for a long time,
that we're seeing accomplices disguised as opponents.
How's that Cao Cao? It's your style, except you liked to do it the other way around.
The adversary disguised as a valued guest.
And an accomplice disguised as an enemy, I think it's a new word in the art of lying.
It's been done a million times before?
Forgive me, men of science, for my stupidity and ignorance.

It's a complicated issue. Diplomacy is at stake here.
And respect for what is dressed up as power, in general.
Global things can be shaken,
namely, breaking an expensive jade vase by throwing a decisive shoe at this mouse.
And the result is: mouse killed, vase shattered.
You just have to aim better.
Oh! The greatest Juge Liang.
They could, but they won't, so I hope the reasons for that have at least been discussed.

I swear, they all have secret Chinese advisors.
But no one's even hiding behind those screens.
There's someone behind that curtain. Hamlet, is there a rat in there?
Invite the ever-drunk Phoenix Chick, he's a calculator and he'll do the math.
He's not coming,
they've turned off their brains and are relying on the neural net to do the math.

Of course, speaking suspicion instead of certainty,
It's also an element of politeness from the same tradition.
And of course, but I said suspicion,
It's a polonaise of political curtsey -
the law can't act illegally
without discrediting itself.
The neural net doesn't have the brains to refute that assertion,
And the Phoenix Chick isn't coming.
You should have asked him three times.

But there isn't even someone who could think of doing that.
And power will only be treated with parity to the one who has the label of power.
Without realizing that it might be fake,
The “no parity either way” option is not considered by them,
because it would call into question their own label of authority too,
and there's no way that's going to happen.